Re: Short circuit boolean evaluation

["Steve" <nospam_steved94@comcast.net>]

If you look in the history of this newsgroup on google, you'll find that
this subject has already been discussed extensively.

I consider it unimaginable to make such a fundamental change to a language
in order to save a few keystrokes when more than a few billion lines of
source code might be effected.

Steve
(The Duck)


"svaa" <svaa@ciberpiula.net> wrote in message
news:87f5a614.0311051528.30450c7a@posting.google.com...
[snip]
>
> Anyhow, I think that even without backward compatibility, the advanges
> of short circuit evaluation are worth.
>
> But if someone can't live with of full evaluation you could add the
> operators "or always" and "and always", I'm sure they will be less
> used than "or else" and "and then" ;-)