From: Ted Dennison<dennison@telepath.com>
Subject: Re: why? US Army Ada software converted to C++?
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2001 16:06:14 GMT
Date: 2001-10-09T16:06:14+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <VfFw7.21684$ev2.30095@www.newsranger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Vu5MWbKlnIGK@eisner.encompasserve.org
In article <Vu5MWbKlnIGK@eisner.encompasserve.org>, Larry Kilgallen says...
>
>In article <3BC0F319.C76E4E78@adaworks.com>, Richard Riehle <richard@adaworks.com> writes:
>If the path of Ada is in fact superior, those contractors will rise to
>the top.
Using free-market based theory when talking about *government* contracting has
flaws so obvious, I'd think I don't even have to enumerate them...
---
T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html
No trees were killed in the sending of this message.
However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-09 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-06 21:56 why? US Army Ada software converted to C++? rob
2001-10-06 23:35 ` David Emery
2001-10-07 1:16 ` Jim44.
2001-10-07 7:31 ` tmoran
2001-10-07 21:22 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-10-07 22:00 ` James Rogers
2001-10-07 23:59 ` Dale Stanbrough
2001-10-08 0:10 ` Preben Randhol
2001-10-09 18:12 ` Marin David Condic
2001-10-09 19:05 ` Ted Dennison
2001-10-09 20:36 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-10-09 22:01 ` Marin David Condic
2001-10-07 1:49 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-10-07 12:09 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-10-09 16:03 ` Ted Dennison
2001-10-08 0:28 ` Richard Riehle
2001-10-08 0:39 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-10-08 3:26 ` Pi
2001-10-09 16:06 ` Ted Dennison [this message]
2001-10-08 10:41 ` Petter Fryklund
2001-10-08 13:20 ` Alfred Hilscher
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox