From: Shark8 <OneWingedShark@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: "use" after "limited with" (GNAT bug?)
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 18:52:01 -0600
Date: 2014-08-14T18:52:01-06:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <VQcHv.301333$YC3.294813@fx04.iad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <lsivt6$ecc$1@speranza.aioe.org>
On 14-Aug-14 12:41, Victor Porton wrote:
> Not a language lawyer, but may be it makes sense to introduced "limited use"
> clauses?
How would it work?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-15 0:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-14 18:08 "use" after "limited with" (GNAT bug?) Victor Porton
2014-08-14 18:37 ` Adam Beneschan
2014-08-14 18:41 ` Victor Porton
2014-08-15 0:52 ` Shark8 [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox