From: vladimir@speedy.intrepid.com (Vladimir Vukicevic)
Subject: Re: GNAT 2.04 Linux binaries?
Date: 1995/04/20
Date: 1995-04-20T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <VLADIMIR.95Apr19211236@speedy.intrepid.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3mm4vn$f52@mica.inel.gov
In article <D747BK.FCJ@nntpa.cb.att.com> ka@socrates.hr.att.com (Kenneth Almquist) writes:
> (In traditional C setjmp is a library routine. In ANSI C, setjmp
> is a macro defined in setjmp.h. Linux follows the ANSI C standard
> and defines setjmp to be __setjmp.)
> Kenneth Almquist
Speaking of this, does anyone know of any reason -why- ANSI C specifies
this? Or did someone just go off on a whim and say "Hey! Let's make
setjmp a macro, and break interfacing to every other language! Yeah!"?
Vladimir
next parent reply other threads:[~1995-04-20 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <RBREWER.95Apr13234004@rwb114.rh.psu.edu>
[not found] ` <3mm4vn$f52@mica.inel.gov>
1995-04-20 0:00 ` Vladimir Vukicevic [this message]
1995-04-21 0:00 ` GNAT 2.04 Linux binaries? Kenneth Almquist
1995-04-21 0:00 ` Paul H. Whittington
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox