From: "Mike Silva" <mjsilva@jps.net>
Subject: Re: Unchecked_Conversion on different sized types -- problem?
Date: 2000/01/13
Date: 2000-01-13T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Uftf4.443$dw3.15545@news.wenet.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: j3tf4.441$dw3.15504@news.wenet.net
Mike Silva wrote in message ...
Disregard the nonsense I just wrote -- I guess I wasn't paying close
attention to what I was responding to. My *new* response is that such a
translation array just seems like an extra layer, but maybe it is a better
solution than UC.
Mike
>This seems "busy", but my biggest objection would be having to enter the
>same data twice (and keeping both sets consistent) -- isn't that always a
>rich source of errors?
>
>Mike
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-01-13 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-01-13 0:00 Unchecked_Conversion on different sized types -- problem? Mike Silva
2000-01-13 0:00 ` Jim Rogers
2000-01-13 0:00 ` Mike Silva
2000-01-13 0:00 ` James S. Rogers
2000-01-13 0:00 ` Bryce Bardin
2000-01-13 0:00 ` Mike Silva
2000-01-13 0:00 ` Mike Silva [this message]
2000-01-14 0:00 ` Bryce Bardin
2000-01-14 0:00 ` Mike Silva
2000-01-14 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
2000-01-13 0:00 ` reason67
2000-01-14 0:00 ` Keith Thompson
2000-01-16 0:00 ` David A. Cobb
2000-01-14 0:00 ` Jeff Carter
2000-01-14 0:00 ` Wrap-Up (was Re: Unchecked_Conversion on different sized types -- problem?) Mike Silva
2000-01-15 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
2000-01-15 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
2000-01-14 0:00 ` Unchecked_Conversion on different sized types -- problem? Werner Pachler
2000-01-14 0:00 ` Bryce Bardin
2000-01-14 0:00 ` reason67
2000-01-14 0:00 ` Vladimir Olensky
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox