From: Matt Majka <matthewmajka@mac.com>
Subject: Re: Is Ada preferred over C/C++ for the realtime domain?
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 02:29:07 GMT
Date: 2002-04-25T02:29:07+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <TRJx8.12491$vX.2072@rwcrnsc53> (raw)
In-Reply-To: a9pass$9ct$1@nh.pace.co.uk
Marin David Condic wrote:
>
>There are also lots of commercial Ada projects as well - especially where
>high reliability, long project life and real-time/embedded considerations
>are a big deal.
The Boeing 777, for example.
Ada is required by Boeing for DO-178B Levels A and B. For lower
levels it is still preferred, but you can try to convince them to allow
you to use something else. They shy away from C++ altogether.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-25 2:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <a9j5mr$du7$1@newsserv.intranet.gr>
[not found] ` <a9kb03$dl5$1@cascade.cs.ubc.ca>
[not found] ` <rpnv8.43627$tZ1.8623318@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com>
[not found] ` <a9l3um$o31$1@cascade.cs.ubc.ca>
[not found] ` <X7pv8.80759$WM.136759360@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com>
[not found] ` <a9n4sa$dfj$1@cascade.cs.ubc.ca>
2002-04-19 2:13 ` Is Ada preferred over C/C++ for the realtime domain? Pat Rogers
2002-04-19 15:00 ` Wes Groleau
[not found] ` <8a63570b.0204170122.808e23c@posting.google.com>
[not found] ` <a9k5vp$3kbjn$1@ID-111521.news.dfncis.de>
[not found] ` <3CBF7A7A.A67B7D92@ameritel.net>
2002-04-19 14:51 ` Marin David Condic
2002-04-20 16:08 ` Stefan Skoglund
2002-04-25 2:29 ` Matt Majka [this message]
2002-04-25 8:00 ` Antonio López
2002-04-25 14:27 ` Marin David Condic
2002-04-17 8:00 Peter Hermann
2002-04-17 15:10 ` Stephen Leake
2002-04-18 8:45 ` Peter Hermann
2002-04-18 16:08 ` Ted Dennison
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox