comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: anon@anon.org (anon)
Subject: Re: GNAT and OpenCL
Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 10:25:55 GMT
Date: 2009-05-07T10:25:55+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <TGyMl.30324$941.15140@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5994b17b-0276-488d-9ea9-d791bbc81265@j18g2000prm.googlegroups.com

I would say No, because the concept of using a GPU for non-graphical 
uses is a "Safety" concern that the Ada RM might have issue with. 

Also, Ada is still primary a Concurrent language. But it also allows tasks to be 
placed on multiple cpus and/or systems controlled by the Ada RTL and the 
programmer. In this design it can go beyond the scope of the openCL 
without harming the existing hardware or adding layers upon layers of code. 
So, I see no reason for Ada or GNAT to use openCL.

And third, if GNAT wanted to try openCL, first GNU GCC would need to 
support the object code needed for CPU/GPU/DSP and openCL.  And GPU 
companies are not that friendly to the GPL and GNU groups.


In <5994b17b-0276-488d-9ea9-d791bbc81265@j18g2000prm.googlegroups.com>, Jerry <lanceboyle@qwest.net> writes:
>Does anyone know if there is going to be a GNAT that takes advantage
>of OpenCL (Open Computing Language)?
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenCL
>Jerry




  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-05-07 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-07  4:38 GNAT and OpenCL Jerry
2009-05-07  9:32 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
2009-05-07 10:25 ` anon [this message]
2009-05-07 12:25   ` Martin
2009-05-07 16:35     ` Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
2009-05-07 22:15   ` Ivan Levashew
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox