comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: world!srctran@uunet.uu.net  (Gregory Aharonian)
Subject: Re: Data shows Top 50 Software Vendors not using Ada
Date: 7 Jun 93 02:31:34 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <SRCTRAN.93Jun6213134@world.std.com> (raw)

John,

>The DoD is responsible for maintaining huge amounts of embedded software
>for very long periods of time.  If each procurer is free to choose the
>implementation language that make his program's creation cheapest, there
>will be an overwhelming number of language/dialects to be maintained by
>this department (read tax-dollars).  The point of the mandate is the ease 
>this management problem.

Like it or not, the DoD already has a multi-language problem.  A growing
number of those inside the DoD are ignoring the Mandate and using what's
available.  DARPA was, is and will always be funding stuff that will never
use Ada.  To get jobs when they are booted out of the DoD, soldier-types
are using C/C++.  All I am asking for is that the DoD confess to the
hypocrisy that the DoD is a one language institution.  It isn't because
based on their behavior, and not their words, the DoD is at best apathetic
towards Ada.  The Ada Mandate has done absolutely nothing to making the
DoD a one language organization.  Too many of its people act otherwise.
And the DoD doesn't have the decency to fund a honest study of what is
actually going on inside the Mandated world.

>IT IS NOT THE GOVERNMENTS JOB TO MAKE ADA SUCCESSFUL IN THE OPEN MARKET.

Read the Ada Mandate.  Congress, at someone's behest, but the phrase
"cost effective" into the law.  If for the DoD to make the Ada Mandate work
requires that Ada be successful in the open market, then the DoD has
to take steps to make it successful.  Let DARPA orchestrate it, since
they know very well how to influence markets and get contractors to do
what they want.

Besides, the DoD for the last three years has suppressed an Air Force
report stating that the country does not have the infrastructure to
support the Mandate.

So as long as this hypocrisy goes on at taxpayer expense, there is not
enough bandwidth available for such postings.


-- 
**************************************************************************
 Greg Aharonian
 Source Translation & Optimization
 P.O. Box 404, Belmont, MA 02178

             reply	other threads:[~1993-06-07  2:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1993-06-07  2:31 Gregory Aharonian [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1993-06-18 13:14 Data shows Top 50 Software Vendors not using Ada Phil Thornley , BAe
1993-06-17 19:06 Jo Uhde, aka DrJo
1993-06-16 13:33 cis.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!caen!uvaarpa!murdoch!holme
1993-06-16  9:59 Ian Wild
1993-06-15 22:22 James Crigler
1993-06-15 15:48 agate!howland.reston.ans.net!darwin.sura.net!uvaarpa!murdoch!holmes.acc.V
1993-06-12 15:14 Gregory Aharonian
1993-06-11  4:03 David Emery
1993-06-10  1:40 news
1993-06-09 22:15 cis.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.
1993-06-07 23:05 Robert I. Eachus
1993-06-06  3:16 Michael Feldman
1993-06-05 21:40 Gregory Aharonian
1993-06-05 20:56 John Bollenbacher
1993-06-05 15:14 cis.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!linus
1993-06-04 21:18 deccrl!news.crl.dec.com!dbased.nuo.dec.com!digits.enet.dec.com!brett
1993-06-04 17:10 agate!howland.reston.ans.net!noc.near.net!nic.umass.edu!ymir.cs.umass.edu
1993-06-04 14:42 David Tannen x8273
1993-06-04 13:02 howland.reston.ans.net!agate!linus!linus.mitre.org!mwunix.mitre.org!m2358
1993-06-04  4:29 Gregory Aharonian
1993-06-04  0:45 Rod Cheshire
1993-06-03 19:15 dog.ee.lbl.gov!overload.lbl.gov!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.g
1993-06-03 18:23 David Tannen x8273
1993-06-03 15:48 Gregory Aharonian
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox