Re: Access to subprograms

[sean@graph.es.hac.com (Sean McNeil)]

In article <D65sAw.3AI@inmet.camb.inmet.com> stt@spock.camb.inmet.com (Tucker Taft) writes:

>   : |> From my casual and uninformed reading of the RM, it
>   : |> seems that something like "+"'Access is legal, even,
>   : |> heaven forbid, for a predefined instance of "+".
>
>   : It's prohibited by RM95 6.3.1, paragraphs 4, 7, and 11.  (Predefined "+"
>   : operators have convention Intrinsic, and 'Access is prohibited for
>   : subprograms with this convention.)  Instead, you can write
>
>   :    function My_Wrapper (Left, Right: Integer) return Integer is
>   :    begin
>   :       return Left + Right;
>   :    end My_Wrapper;
>
[...]

Does a renamed Predefined "+" operator also have convention Intrinsic status?

i.e.

function My_Plus(Left, Right : Integer) return Integer renames "+";

I assume it is, but I'd thought I'd ask.

Sean McNeil