From: Ted Dennison<dennison@telepath.com>
Subject: Re: with child: access to parent
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001 14:17:22 GMT
Date: 2001-10-02T14:17:22+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <S%ju7.12677$ev2.20101@www.newsranger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 9pchrq$8vt$1@infosun2.rus.uni-stuttgart.de
In article <9pchrq$8vt$1@infosun2.rus.uni-stuttgart.de>, Peter Hermann says...
>with a.b.c.d;
>
>is equivalent to
>
>with a;
>with a.b;
>with a.b.c;
>with a.b.c.d;
I'm not sure if that's what the LRM passage is saying, but this is the case. Try
it out yourself. Essentially, all those "with"s but the last one are redundant.
---
T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html
home email - mailto:dennison@telepath.com
No trees were killed in the sending of this message.
However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-02 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-02 10:06 with child: access to parent Peter Hermann
2001-10-02 10:49 ` Pat Rogers
2001-10-02 12:53 ` Marc A. Criley
2001-10-02 14:25 ` Peter Hermann
2001-10-02 14:44 ` Pat Rogers
2001-10-02 14:10 ` Peter Hermann
2001-10-02 14:17 ` Ted Dennison [this message]
2001-10-02 15:17 ` Wes Groleau
2001-10-02 16:14 ` Peter Hermann
2001-10-12 13:58 ` Simon Wright
2001-10-02 14:22 ` Pat Rogers
2001-10-08 10:51 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2001-10-11 15:07 ` Peter Hermann
2001-10-11 14:54 ` Pat Rogers
2001-10-03 0:34 ` dale
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox