From: tmoran@acm.org
Subject: Re: better way?
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 18:46:08 GMT
Date: 2001-01-05T18:46:08+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <QDo56.89140$A06.3225164@news1.frmt1.sfba.home.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 931r2k$4ai5t$1@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de
>...Inner_A_Thing_Type and Inner_B_Thing_Type are so closely related, the
>definitions of these types and their primitive operations all belong
The problem is that there are two (or more) (sub)packages, each of
which defines a Thing_Type, and each of which has zero or more procedures
that need to access the *other* package's Thing_Type. I want compile
time checking that the right Things are being passed to the various
procedures. Also, this code is coming out of a special purpose code
generator, so major changes in the package structure are highly undesirable.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-05 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-12-22 7:08 better way? tmoran
2000-12-23 3:12 ` Robert Dewar
2000-12-27 9:00 ` mark_lundquist
2001-01-03 5:00 ` Nick Roberts
2001-01-05 18:46 ` tmoran [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox