From: Colin Paul Gloster <Colin_Paul_Gloster@ACM.org>
Subject: Re: Static vs Dynamic binding and its effect on maintenance of software
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 13:57:34 +0000
Date: 2009-01-01T13:57:34+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.64.0901011356170.21104@abril> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CZ17l.4150$jZ1.3155@flpi144.ffdc.sbc.com>
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009, Nasser Abbasi wrote:
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|"From "Object-Oriented programming and Java", ISBN 981-308-396-4 |
| |
|I am posting this on Ada group for comments, since Ada is well known for its |
|static binding more than any other language I know. |
| |
|"Static binding is limited and may lead to difficulty in software |
|maintenance. Dynamic binding, on the other hand, provides design flexibility |
|and may enhance software maintainability" |
| |
|Here is a screen shot of the page where the above was taken |
|http://12000.org/tmp/010109/static_binding.png |
| |
|I understand how dynamic binding can be more 'flexible', but why static |
|binding "may lead to difficulty in software maintenance" ? I do not |
|understand the rational behind this. |
| |
|I would have thought than dynamic binding would do that more than static |
|binding?" |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
I agree that static binding is better.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-01 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-01 11:41 Static vs Dynamic binding and its effect on maintenance of software Nasser Abbasi
2009-01-01 13:57 ` Colin Paul Gloster [this message]
2009-01-01 14:41 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2009-01-03 19:07 ` hesobreira
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox