From: stefan-lucks@see-the.signature
Subject: Conversion from Ada95 to Ada05 (Was: Does ada have a sscanf equivalent?)
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:36:47 +0100
Date: 2010-02-23T10:36:47+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1002231026050.9207@medsec1.medien.uni-weimar.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bdcf2cf7-312e-469a-9085-ef647f69f894@g8g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, jpwoodruff wrote:
> I'm a retired software engineer who has decided not to follow the new
> standard. I decided that I don't need a new programming paradigm
> (except maybe for prolog). And some of my old favorites didn't work
> with the '05 compiler I looked at.
I am curios: Which of your old favorites didn't work anymore? Which Ada95
patterns occur in practice, which are incompatible to Ada05?
The only issue I had when converting Ada my own software from Ada95 to
Ada05 was a very trivial one related to identifiers which had become
keywords. (Namely, I happened to use the identifier "Interface".) And one
or two compiler bugs which have gone now. So my impression was that the
Ada05 guys did an excellent job at preserving compatibility to Ada95.
So long
Stefan
--
------ Stefan Lucks -- Bauhaus-University Weimar -- Germany ------
Stefan dot Lucks at uni minus weimar dot de
------ I love the taste of Cryptanalysis in the morning! ------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-23 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-22 9:08 Does ada have a sscanf equivalent? J.s
2010-02-22 10:24 ` Georg Bauhaus
2010-02-22 10:42 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
2010-02-22 15:38 ` J.s
2010-02-22 19:48 ` jpwoodruff
2010-02-22 23:11 ` Jerry
2010-02-23 2:11 ` jpwoodruff
2010-02-23 9:36 ` stefan-lucks [this message]
2010-02-23 19:48 ` Conversion from Ada95 to Ada05 (Was: Does ada have a sscanf equivalent?) Randy Brukardt
2010-02-23 21:12 ` Conversion from Ada95 to Ada05 Robert A Duff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox