* GNAT/GCC 3.0?
@ 2001-08-09 18:37 lange92
2001-08-10 2:19 ` Larry Kilgallen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: lange92 @ 2001-08-09 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
A while back I read something about GCC including gnat in the main gcc
tree. Has anyone heard about the plans to include it in gcc recently?
DanL
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: GNAT/GCC 3.0?
2001-08-09 18:37 GNAT/GCC 3.0? lange92
@ 2001-08-10 2:19 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-08-10 10:42 ` Robert Dewar
2001-08-10 11:15 ` nicolas
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Larry Kilgallen @ 2001-08-10 2:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
In article <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108091330420.130-100000@2067.resnet.uni.edu>, <lange92@2067.resnet.uni.edu> writes:
> A while back I read something about GCC including gnat in the main gcc
> tree. Has anyone heard about the plans to include it in gcc recently?
Yes, I have read about it in this newsgroup within the past two weeks.
I don't remember the details, but you could check an archive.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: GNAT/GCC 3.0?
2001-08-10 2:19 ` Larry Kilgallen
@ 2001-08-10 10:42 ` Robert Dewar
2001-08-10 11:15 ` nicolas
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Robert Dewar @ 2001-08-10 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam (Larry Kilgallen) wrote in message news:<6BbNZYxtKoM8@eisner.encompasserve.org>...
> In article <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108091330420.130-100000@2067.resnet.uni.edu>, <lange92@2067.resnet.uni.edu> writes:
> > A while back I read something about GCC including gnat in the main gcc
> > tree. Has anyone heard about the plans to include it in gcc recently?
>
> Yes, I have read about it in this newsgroup within the past two weeks.
> I don't remember the details, but you could check an archive.
This is still in the works, and we hope to see something happen in
the next couple of weeks (probably realistically at the start of
September at this stage).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: GNAT/GCC 3.0?
2001-08-10 2:19 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-08-10 10:42 ` Robert Dewar
@ 2001-08-10 11:15 ` nicolas
2001-08-10 12:50 ` Florian Weimer
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: nicolas @ 2001-08-10 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 716 bytes --]
In the middle of June, R.Dewar talked about days/weeks rather than months
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-06/msg01053.html
According to that, this should happen in the next few days
"Larry Kilgallen" <Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam> a �crit dans le
message news: 6BbNZYxtKoM8@eisner.encompasserve.org...
> In article <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108091330420.130-100000@2067.resnet.uni.edu>,
<lange92@2067.resnet.uni.edu> writes:
> > A while back I read something about GCC including gnat in the main gcc
> > tree. Has anyone heard about the plans to include it in gcc recently?
>
> Yes, I have read about it in this newsgroup within the past two weeks.
> I don't remember the details, but you could check an archive.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-08-10 12:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-08-09 18:37 GNAT/GCC 3.0? lange92
2001-08-10 2:19 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-08-10 10:42 ` Robert Dewar
2001-08-10 11:15 ` nicolas
2001-08-10 12:50 ` Florian Weimer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox