From: Brian Rogoff <bpr@shell5.ba.best.com>
Subject: Re: package dependence question
Date: 2000/05/30
Date: 2000-05-30T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005301213050.16745-100000@shell5.ba.best.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: wccog5o809g.fsf@world.std.com
On Tue, 30 May 2000, Robert A Duff wrote:
> Carl Banks <oaf@psu.edu> writes:
>
> > My question is, is there a better way to define such a doubly-
> > traversible tree, so that different node types need not be defined in
> > the same package?
>
> There is no ideal solution to this problem in Ada 95 (although the ARG
> is currently working on a language modification that will solve the
> problem nicely).
Would you be willing to elaborate further? Is this a variant of Tucker
Taft's "with type" proposal from a few years back?
-- Brian
prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-05-30 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-05-29 0:00 package dependence question Carl Banks
2000-05-29 0:00 ` Jeff Carter
2000-05-29 0:00 ` Ray Blaak
2000-05-29 0:00 ` Antonio Dur�n Dom�nguez
2000-06-03 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
2000-05-29 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-05-30 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
2000-05-30 0:00 ` Ray Blaak
2000-05-30 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox