comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Rogoff <bpr@shell5.ba.best.com>
Subject: Re: Subverting 'Access for Sub-programs
Date: 1999/08/13
Date: 1999-08-13T00:00:00+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9908131632421.23367-100000@shell5.ba.best.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7ovrd0$1d9$1@nnrp1.deja.com

On Fri, 13 Aug 1999, Robert Dewar wrote:
> Really what we need to do at this stage is to try to get some
> idea of what the Ada user community wants. GNAT users are not
> the best source of help here, since the problem is already
> completely solved in GNAT (although of course not in a portable
> manner!)

I think GNAT users are as good a source of help as any other
implementation bound subset of Ada users. At least GNAT users 
can speak from experience as to how useful Unrestricted_Access 
is, what contexts they use it in, etc. I can tell you that I much 
prefer it to using generics to simulate downward funargs, though I almost
always use generics because that approach is portable between compilers.
From the question which started this thread, I presume many people agree. 
I still think generic subprograms are useful for type checking, like 
the "where clauses" of CLU and Theta, but as downward funargs they only 
provide a clumsy workaround, IMO of course :-).

> For users of other compilers, how much of a restriction is it
> to have access-to-procedure have the limitations of the current
> Ada 95 design, that is the question.
> 
> I certainly know, as I have previously noted, that we make
> extensive use of Unrestricted_Access in the GNAT runtime (there
> are well over 100 instances in gnatlib). This is certainly not
> typical. First, a lot of it is low level system type code,
> second, you tend to use features that are available if it is
> the easiest way of doing things, and it does not always mean
> that you couldn't manage OK without them :-)

Well, since much of the philosophy of Ada is about readability,
maintainability, reusable libraries, etc., the fact that the 
use of these GNAT extensions makes programming easier is telling!

I certainly wouldn't abandon Ada over this deficiency, but given the 
fact that Ada has nested functions and lexical scope, the absence of 
direct support for downward funargs is very irritating. 

-- Brian






  reply	other threads:[~1999-08-13  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-08-03  0:00 Subverting 'Access for Sub-programs Anton Gibbs
1999-08-03  0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1999-08-03  0:00 ` tmoran
1999-08-03  0:00 ` Steve Doiel
1999-08-03  0:00 ` Michael F. Yoder
1999-08-03  0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
1999-08-03  0:00 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
1999-08-05  0:00   ` Robert A Duff
1999-08-04  0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-08-04  0:00   ` Robert A Duff
1999-08-04  0:00     ` Robert Dewar
1999-08-04  0:00 ` Anton Gibbs
1999-08-04  0:00   ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
1999-08-04  0:00     ` Brian Rogoff
1999-08-05  0:00       ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
1999-08-05  0:00         ` Robert A Duff
1999-08-05  0:00           ` tmoran
1999-08-06  0:00             ` Robert A Duff
1999-08-05  0:00           ` Brian Rogoff
1999-08-06  0:00             ` Robert Dewar
1999-08-09  0:00               ` Tucker Taft
1999-08-10  0:00                 ` Robert Dewar
1999-08-11  0:00                   ` Tucker Taft
1999-08-13  0:00                     ` Robert Dewar
1999-08-13  0:00                       ` Brian Rogoff [this message]
1999-08-13  0:00                     ` Robert Dewar
1999-08-11  0:00                   ` Robert A Duff
1999-08-11  0:00                     ` Robert Dewar
1999-08-11  0:00                   ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
1999-08-11  0:00                     ` Robert Dewar
1999-08-12  0:00                       ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
1999-08-14  0:00                         ` Robert Dewar
1999-08-16  0:00                           ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
1999-08-11  0:00                     ` Richard D Riehle
1999-08-05  0:00           ` Robert Dewar
1999-08-05  0:00         ` adam
1999-08-05  0:00           ` Robert Dewar
1999-08-05  0:00             ` What is a Display ? (was: Subverting 'Access for Sub-programs) Larry Kilgallen
1999-08-05  0:00               ` Hyman Rosen
1999-08-06  0:00                 ` Robert Dewar
1999-08-06  0:00               ` Robert Dewar
1999-08-05  0:00           ` Subverting 'Access for Sub-programs adam
1999-08-06  0:00             ` Robert A Duff
1999-08-06  0:00               ` adam
1999-08-09  0:00                 ` Mark Biggar
1999-08-09  0:00                 ` Robert A Duff
1999-08-06  0:00         ` Brian Rogoff
1999-08-07  0:00           ` Gautier
1999-08-05  0:00     ` Robert A Duff
1999-08-05  0:00       ` Robert Dewar
1999-08-05  0:00         ` Brian Rogoff
1999-08-04  0:00   ` Robert A Duff
1999-08-04  0:00     ` Brian Rogoff
1999-08-05  0:00       ` tmoran
1999-08-05  0:00         ` Robert Dewar
1999-08-05  0:00           ` Ray Blaak
1999-08-06  0:00             ` Robert Dewar
1999-08-06  0:00               ` Robert A Duff
1999-08-08  0:00                 ` Brian Rogoff
1999-08-09  0:00                   ` Robert A Duff
1999-08-10  0:00                     ` Brian Rogoff
1999-08-09  0:00                 ` Tucker Taft
1999-08-06  0:00             ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
1999-08-06  0:00               ` Hyman Rosen
1999-08-07  0:00                 ` Florian Weimer
1999-08-05  0:00         ` Aidan Skinner
1999-08-05  0:00     ` Anton Gibbs
1999-08-05  0:00   ` Steve Quinlan
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox