From: Brian Rogoff <bpr@shell5.ba.best.com>
Subject: MI for Ada
Date: 1999/02/11
Date: 1999-02-11T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9902111400440.7727-100000@shell5.ba.best.com> (raw)
Hi,
I've been thinking lately about how to go about adding Java style
interfaces or GNU C++ signatures to Ada. While syntax is probably the
easiest part of such an addition, I thought I'd pose the topic here to
others who've undoubtedly thought longer on this topic than I have. Does
anyone have strong opinions on this topic (syntax), like whether new
keywords should be added or not?
I find the restricted MI of Java and GNU C++ signatures appealing.
Ada already has forms of MI of implementation, so such an addition would
make Ada OOP significantly nicer, without making it much more complex.
Comments?
-- Brian
next reply other threads:[~1999-02-11 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-02-11 0:00 Brian Rogoff [this message]
1999-02-11 0:00 ` MI for Ada Tucker Taft
1999-02-12 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
1999-02-12 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
1999-02-13 0:00 ` Alexy V Khrabrov
1999-02-14 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
1999-02-15 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-18 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
1999-02-16 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
1999-02-16 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-16 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
1999-02-17 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox