From: Ehud Lamm <mslamm@mscc.huji.ac.il>
Subject: re: GNAT probem (should have been on chat@gnat)
Date: 1999/10/12
Date: 1999-10-12T11:03:37+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.3.96-heb-2.07.991012125455.86594F-100000@pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il> (raw)
I'd venture a gues about my problem.
I think it was the result of an elaboration order problem. I didn't see
any discussion of this in the docs, but I don't see any reason why the
result of gnatmake -f will produce the same elab order as a gnatmake with
no -f. So perhpas this is the cause. I added a pragma...
Wheter this really solved the problem the original problem I don't know
(since the code is evolving rapidly) but I guess I will use -gnatwl next
time I have a similiar problem.
By the way: I really enjoyed the output of gnatbind -e. Is it a feature or
a bug that it goes to stderr (only the header goes to stdout)? I caught it
with >& in DOS. (GNAT3.11)
Nice tool
Ehud Lamm mslamm@mscc.huji.ac.il
http://purl.oclc.org/NET/ehudlamm <== My home on the web
Check it out and subscribe to the E-List- for interesting essays and more!
next reply other threads:[~1999-10-12 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-10-12 0:00 Ehud Lamm [this message]
1999-10-12 0:00 ` GNAT probem (should have been on chat@gnat) Ehud Lamm
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox