From: Ehud Lamm <mslamm@mscc.huji.ac.il>
Subject: Re: One type for all
Date: 1999/07/10
Date: 1999-07-10T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.3.96-heb-2.07.990710013813.72936A-100000@pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3786741C.E73F1124@hso.link.com
On Fri, 9 Jul 1999, Samuel T. Harris wrote:
> Types in both Ada 83 and Ada 95 use name-equivalence instead
> of structural-equivalence
Note that when you instantiate a generic a strucutural equivalence is
required (according to the generic rules).
Ehud Lamm mslamm@pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il
http://purl.oclc.org/NET/ehudlamm <== My home on the web
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-07-10 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3783E0D2.5D74243@boeing.com>
1999-07-08 0:00 ` One type for all czgrr
1999-07-09 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-07-10 0:00 ` Ehud Lamm [this message]
1999-07-12 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-07-12 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-07-12 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1999-07-17 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-07-18 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-07-18 0:00 ` Keith Thompson
1999-07-19 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-07-18 0:00 ` Keith Thompson
1999-07-19 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1999-07-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-07-19 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-07-20 0:00 ` Bill Findlay
1999-07-12 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox