From: Ehud Lamm <mslamm@mscc.huji.ac.il>
Subject: Re: Looking for implementation idea
Date: 1999/02/11
Date: 1999-02-11T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.3.96-heb-2.07.990211154307.89084A-100000@pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 79oiek$dqc$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com
On Tue, 9 Feb 1999 robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com wrote:
> In my view, FAR too much emphasis was placed on efficient
> implementation on bare board monoprocessors, at the expense
> of generalizing the capabilities and extending the
> abstraction. The restrictions on protected types cannot be
> justified from an abstraction point of view, they are
> pretty much efficiency dictated (I nearly wrote kludges :-)
can you be a little more specific about what you would have done
differently?
Ehud Lamm mslamm@pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-02-11 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-02-07 0:00 Looking for implementation idea Thomas Handler
1999-02-07 0:00 ` Niklas Holsti
1999-02-08 0:00 ` Thomas Handler
1999-02-09 0:00 ` Niklas Holsti
1999-02-10 0:00 ` Thomas Handler
1999-02-07 0:00 ` Corey Minyard
1999-02-07 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1999-02-07 0:00 ` Corey Minyard
1999-02-07 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1999-02-08 0:00 ` dewar
1999-02-08 0:00 ` dennison
1999-02-08 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-07 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-02-07 0:00 ` Corey Minyard
1999-02-08 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-02-07 0:00 ` Corey Minyard
1999-02-08 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-08 0:00 ` dennison
1999-02-08 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-02-09 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-11 0:00 ` Ehud Lamm [this message]
1999-02-08 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-08 0:00 ` Thomas Handler
1999-02-07 0:00 ` Paul Duquennoy
1999-02-08 0:00 ` Thomas Handler
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox