From: Jeffrey Carter <spam@spam.com>
Subject: Re: Conditional compilation in Ada?
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:44:15 GMT
Date: 2004-11-18T17:44:15+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pb5nd.29458$KJ6.2533@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CfVmd.110500$R05.57670@attbi_s53>
Steve wrote:
> Using variant records means explicitly checking for the variant type and
> taking different action based on the variant. Creating a new variation of
> the record means modifying the original record (modifying proven code is
> never a good thing when it is easily avoided) and chasing each part of the
> code that takes different action based on the variants.
Since the compiler points out any place where you've forgotten, this is
hardly a problem; indeed, I would claim that it's an advantage over OOP,
where forgetting to redefine an operation is ignored by the compiler,
and you get the wrong action instead.
In a well designed system, all the code dealing with the variant record
and its variants will be together, so there's no "chasing each part of
the code".
Another advantage of using a variant record is that what happens is
explicit in the code, not hidden is some package that is not mentioned
in a context clause.
> Using objects means deriving a new object and overloading specific
> operations for that object. The base object isn't touched.
And operations that are mistakenly not overridden become run-time errors.
> Also: If the object is declared statically, the dispatching may happen
> statically.
This is true, but it seems that the nature of OP's problem would prevent
this.
--
Jeff Carter
"I fart in your general direction."
Monty Python & the Holy Grail
05
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-18 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-16 18:30 Conditional compilation in Ada? jtg
2004-11-16 18:45 ` Marius Amado Alves
2004-11-16 20:41 ` Nick Roberts
2004-11-17 8:36 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2004-11-16 19:03 ` Jeffrey Carter
2004-11-16 19:13 ` Hyman Rosen
2004-11-16 19:41 ` Björn Lundin
2004-11-16 20:08 ` tmoran
2004-11-16 20:27 ` Hyman Rosen
2004-11-16 23:49 ` Jim Rogers
2004-11-16 20:43 ` Martin Dowie
2004-11-16 19:06 ` tmoran
2004-11-17 9:39 ` Adrien Plisson
2004-11-17 16:39 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
2004-11-17 2:44 ` Steve
2004-11-17 20:30 ` Jeffrey Carter
2004-11-18 4:09 ` Steve
2004-11-18 6:49 ` Martin Dowie
2004-11-18 15:17 ` Georg Bauhaus
2004-11-18 19:12 ` Martin Dowie
2004-11-18 17:34 ` Jeffrey Carter
2004-11-18 17:44 ` Jeffrey Carter [this message]
2004-11-18 18:03 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2004-11-19 3:00 ` Steve
2004-11-19 21:35 ` Simon Wright
2004-11-20 2:56 ` Steve
2004-11-20 16:57 ` Simon Wright
2004-11-17 9:28 ` Martin Krischik
2004-11-17 13:39 ` Stephen Leake
2004-11-17 10:02 ` Frank Piron
2004-11-17 12:32 ` Georg Bauhaus
2004-11-17 14:44 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2004-11-18 15:23 ` Georg Bauhaus
2004-11-18 22:10 ` Brian May
2004-11-19 9:03 ` Martin Krischik
2004-11-20 17:31 ` Georg Bauhaus
2004-11-21 9:14 ` Martin Krischik
2004-12-12 0:36 ` Lionel Draghi
2004-12-12 0:17 ` How to switch off those damm warnings about unknows pragma Lionel Draghi
2004-12-13 11:10 ` Georg Bauhaus
2004-12-13 15:07 ` Peter Amey
2004-11-20 1:05 ` Conditional compilation in Ada? Dr. Adrian Wrigley
2004-11-20 17:25 ` Georg Bauhaus
2004-11-23 1:15 ` Arthur Schwarz
2004-11-23 15:42 ` skidmarks
2004-11-17 12:27 ` Marin David Condic
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-11-19 9:13 Christoph Karl Walter Grein
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox