From: "AG" <ang@xtra.co.nz>
Subject: Re: Multitasking theory question
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 15:18:35 +1200
Date: 2002-06-24T15:18:35+12:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <PawR8.3$zt.566@news.xtra.co.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3D128BA9.8090707@telepath.com
"Ted Dennison" <dennison@telepath.com> wrote in message
news:3D128BA9.8090707@telepath.com...
> Kai Schuelke wrote:
> How tasks are implemented is up to the compiler.
<<...>>
> DOS has no process support of any kind, Win32 supports threads.
What does it have to do with DOS or any OS for that matter?
Surely, a run-time system can implement whatever scheduling
it wants to (within hardware capabilities that is). After all, what
is an OS but a glorified run-time system...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-24 3:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-20 20:46 Multitasking theory question Kai Schuelke
2002-06-20 20:53 ` Stephen Leake
2002-06-21 2:13 ` Ted Dennison
2002-06-24 3:18 ` AG [this message]
2002-06-24 4:13 ` tmoran
2002-06-24 4:24 ` AG
2002-06-24 7:33 ` Dale Stanbrough
2002-06-25 3:27 ` AG
2002-06-25 4:48 ` tmoran
2002-06-25 5:00 ` AG
2002-06-25 5:17 ` Darren New
2002-06-25 5:25 ` AG
2002-06-24 5:43 ` Mark Biggar
2002-06-24 6:48 ` AG
2002-06-24 15:14 ` Darren New
2002-06-24 16:19 ` Larry Kilgallen
2002-06-25 2:01 ` AG
2002-06-25 3:21 ` Darren New
2002-06-25 4:01 ` AG
2002-06-25 4:19 ` Darren New
2002-06-25 4:51 ` AG
2002-06-26 1:58 ` Darren New
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox