From: Ed Falis <falis@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Tasking, protected objects, Ada 95 RM
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 15:30:18 GMT
Date: 2006-07-18T15:30:18+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <PM000418DCCDDF5B2E@tilopa.unknown.dom> (raw)
In-Reply-To: PM000418DCB63800B1@tilopa.unknown.dom
Ed Falis wrote:
> An accept statement is not a protected action in the technical jargon
> of
> the RM. So calling connect from there is not potentially blocking.
Sorry, it is "potentially blocking" but not in a manner that is
meaningful in the context of the quote you gave from the RM - it is not
a bounded error in this case.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-18 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-18 15:09 Tasking, protected objects, Ada 95 RM ldb
2006-07-18 15:22 ` Ed Falis
2006-07-18 15:30 ` Ed Falis [this message]
2006-07-18 19:15 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-07-18 21:12 ` Randy Brukardt
2006-07-19 14:00 ` ldb
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-18 16:38 Anh Vo
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox