From: Jeff Creem <jcreem@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: OSS classification
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 07:47:33 -0500
Date: 2005-12-07T07:47:33-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <PLidnfTckOQNRAveRVn-vw@comcast.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1133885883.658086.230320@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Aned wrote:
> Koders.com does a search based on free-text searching mechanism on
> source code, as OSS code usually lack of precise documentation.
> I wonder if any one is aware of any other kinds of classification of
> OSS components(i.e. code fragments)
>
It is even more than that. I submitted a project that was rejected
because there was no publically available version control (e.g. CVS) for
the project.
They said they were working on other means of idexing projects and would
someday be able to support other ways of indexing projects.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-07 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-06 16:18 OSS classification Aned
2005-12-07 12:47 ` Jeff Creem [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox