From: tmoran@bix.com
Subject: Re: Claw & Re: ANNOUNCEMENT - GNAT 3.13p availability
Date: 2000/08/17
Date: 2000-08-17T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <OoWm5.114131$i5.1653554@news1.frmt1.sfba.home.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 8n962s$42n$1@nnrp1.deja.com
>It turns out that OpenToken 2.0 and earlier suffer from this same
>problem. I'm curious if it really is a gnat bug though. I could see
>someone making a case that since the caller's view of the routine in
>question is still abstract, only dynamicly dispatching calls are legal.
I reported the problem to ACT some months ago and have been assured
that they have a fix, which I understand will be in the next Gnat release.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-08-17 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-08-08 0:00 ANNOUNCEMENT - GNAT 3.13p availability Bernard Banner
2000-08-10 0:00 ` Claw & " tmoran
2000-08-14 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-08-14 0:00 ` Simon Wright
2000-08-14 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-08-15 0:00 ` Simon Wright
2000-08-16 2:58 ` Ed Falis
2000-08-16 0:00 ` Simon Wright
2000-08-16 0:00 ` Booch Component Complexity (was: Claw & Re: ANNOUNCEMENT - GNAT 3.13p availability) Ted Dennison
2000-08-17 0:00 ` tmoran [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox