Re: Ada Stuff and some confusion

["chris.danx" <chris.danx@ntlworld.com>]

> > I don't think NT is a good system
>
> You're right -- it sucks
...
>
> > I also don't rate Unix/Linux much either
>
> Sadly, you're right about that too :-/

You think NT, Unix/Linux all suck!  What do you use?  Do you program on the
bare boards or what?  <g>


>
> > NT is a hybrid microkernel and has some nice features
> > but it's still has many faults and shouldn't be modelled by anyone.
>
> strongly agree...

Why are AdaOS doing an NT replacement?  Is it going to be a complete clone
only safer cos' it's Ada?  I don't think if you program in Ada and not C, it
immediately makes the OS better or safer.  You can still f**k things up in
Ada and build an unsafe system.  It's just more difficult to do, but you
shouldn't assume that it's a passport to fault free software.

I'm using Ada because it has a better module system, it has a good type
checking system, support for low-level programming and it's standardised.  I
could still make a crap operating system in Ada.

> >[...]
> > You might just contribute to the project that could make windows look
like
> > the Dinosaur of the OS world.
>
> If you ask me, Windohs *already* looks like the Dinosaur of the OS
World...

Raaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrgggggggh!


> Thank you for reading my completely worthless post :-)

No post is worthless.  You're sharing your thoughts with the world at large
and getting your point across.


Regards,
Chris Campbell