To Markus

[anon@anon.org (anon)]

YOUR THE TROLL!

Since you stated on the 18th that you are not a US citizen 
(Message-ID: <9ky7g95a11.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>). You 
probility do not know how the US protect it borders and how 
the US government uses miss-information to kept the US safe 
from outsiders.

During the "COLD WAR" (mid 1940s to mid 1980s) the DOD and other 
US government departments put out a lot of miss-information and some 
of the truth is still classified even today. And because of how the US 
works on security only a US citizen could find out the truth when the 
information becomes de-classified. 

So, unless your are one of the team members that security has been 
de-classified you should not continue spreading your miss-information. 
But to be on the team at that time you had to be a US citizen.


Note: I only use the miss-information that web sites like 
en.wikipedia.org or Adaic on history when I need a good laugh!


In <ql3ayh6pf9.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>, development-2006-8ecbb5cc8aREMOVETHIS@ANDTHATm-e-leypold.de (Markus writes:
>
>'anon AT anon DOT org (anon)' wrote:
>
>> As for GNAT converting Ada to C.  Try looking at a number of papers 
>> of the net on GNAT Ada and also how to write a Frontend compiler for 
>> gnu's gcc c compiler.  Also, for a direct proof take a look at the C coded 
>> procedure called 'gigi' in file "trans.c" in GCC-4.x Ada source packages.  
>> The 'gigi" procedure is called from the procedure "Call_Back_End" in 
>> file "Back_End.adb". Gnat uses it converts the C (ada tree) tree and 
>> generates the assembly code and finally the object code. This is the 
>> structure of all GCC type compilers that use GCC as a backend.  And 
>> there are a number of papers at GNU on this.
>
>
>Does the expression "intermediate representation" or "intermediate
>code" convey any meaning to you?
>
>>>- F2A is not a Fortran preprocessor for using Ada as the back end; you use it
>>>once and forget the Fortran code, and continue developing the Ada source.
>>>At the end, you have one step. Sorry...
>>
>> I guess you have never tried to increase a codes performance. To prove 
>> each step you must start with the original code every time.  In the F2A 
>> that is, the FORTRAN code.  And sometime to increase a codes 
>> performance you may need to alter the FORTRAN code which has some 
>> documentation and then test it, first. Because for functionally 
>> both the FORTRAN and Ada codes must yield the correct results.  
>> Both in performance and output.
>
>What ist so difficult about "forget"? Forget as in "throw away" ...
>
>- M