From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: ISO Rules on upgrading standards
Date: 14 Jan 2007 07:05:52 -0600
Date: 2007-01-14T07:05:52-06:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ny7j34wsAXTV@eisner.encompasserve.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: mailman.19.1168757044.18371.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org
In article <mailman.19.1168757044.18371.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>, "Robert Leif" <rleif@rleif.com> writes:
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> color:black'>Is paragraph (e) above relevant to the <st1:City =
> w:st=3D"on"><st1:place
> w:st=3D"on">Ada</st1:place></st1:City> standard? If so, would it permit =
> small
> annual or biannual additions to <st1:City w:st=3D"on"><st1:place =
> w:st=3D"on">Ada</st1:place></st1:City>?
> I believe that one of the reasons for the lack of market acceptance for =
> <st1:City
> w:st=3D"on"><st1:place w:st=3D"on">Ada</st1:place></st1:City> has been =
> the present
> 10 year cycle for updating the standard.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
There has to be _some_ language available for those who prefer stability
to trendiness.
next parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-14 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.19.1168757044.18371.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
2007-01-14 13:05 ` Larry Kilgallen [this message]
2007-01-14 13:24 ` ISO Rules on upgrading standards Ludovic Brenta
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox