From: "Stephane Richard" <stephane.richard@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Re: Is CORBA dead for Ada]
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 12:10:21 GMT
Date: 2003-10-21T12:10:21+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Nm9lb.7595$Vf7.2475@nwrdny02.gnilink.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: mailman.141.1066736164.25614.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 841 bytes --]
>Because those things (security etc.) are there in actual implementations
>e.g. GLADE?
*** so GLADE would be the current opposing force to CORBA then. Good
something to read about :-).
>But I understand the desire for a kind of standard extension. If it can
>be done inside the language (perhaps with ASIS), then it could be a CAL
>branch ;-)
*** Depending on how GLADE measures up, this could be an excellent idea for
CAL. Parts of it anyways :-).
>"Keep Ada small, create a big library" could be the internal motto of
>the CAL developers.
*** Short, to the point, catchy. SOLD :-).
--
St�phane Richard
"Ada World" Webmaster
http://www.adaworld.com
"Marius Amado Alves" <amado.alves@netcabo.pt> wrote in message
news:mailman.141.1066736164.25614.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org...
> (Ada-France PLEASE set Reply-To field!)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-21 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-21 11:35 [Fwd: Re: Is CORBA dead for Ada] Marius Amado Alves
2003-10-21 12:10 ` Stephane Richard [this message]
2003-10-21 12:25 ` Marius Amado Alves
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox