comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gary Scott <garylscott@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: another way to shoot yourself in the foot?
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 08:38:50 -0500
Date: 2008-07-05T08:38:50-05:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <NPKbk.14568$N87.10457@nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <g4m2gb$3b3$1@registered.motzarella.org>

Colin Paul Gloster wrote:
> Jeffrey R. Carter <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.acm.org> wrote in message 
> news:brz7k.167222$TT4.46081@attbi_s22 ...
> |------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> |" Robert A Duff wrote: 
> |
> |[..] 
> |
> | 
> |
> |> As Dmitry pointed out, with this idea, there's no need for the "return 
> |
> |> Result;". 
> |
> | 
> |
> | True, but I find it easier to understand the function if it has the 
> explicit |
> | "return Result;"," 
> |
> |------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> 
> I believe that "return Result;" is fine. It is true that it is not
> necessary, in much the same way that IN is redundant for a function's
> mode. Some people had criticized IN for a function for the same
> reason, but people who use many languages (or instead, who do not
> program much) should not be forced to memorize all the ramifications
> of particular language semantics if a piece of excess syntax makes it
> clear for them.
> 
> |------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> |" even though I came to Ada from a Pascal background." 
> |
> |------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> 
> Speaking of which, after my unsuccessful job application to you
> earlier this year (thank you for having the decency to treat my
> application properly though, as did other some contributors to this
> newsgroup when I applied to them, but unfortunately a number of others
> were disrespectful) I very recently joined a group of people who on
> average do not work predominantly as programmers. The languages which
> I have been told are in some of their backgrounds are FORTRAN and C++,
> and we have FORTRAN and C++ codebases which I should improve. How
> better to start than by porting to Ada!?

Or Fortran 95 or Fortran 2003 (ok, 2003 is nearly available)
<snip>
> Regards,
> Colin Paul Gloster 
> 
> 


-- 

Gary Scott
mailto:garylscott@sbcglobal dot net

Fortran Library:  http://www.fortranlib.com

Support the Original G95 Project:  http://www.g95.org
-OR-
Support the GNU GFortran Project:  http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/index.html

If you want to do the impossible, don't hire an expert because he knows 
it can't be done.

-- Henry Ford



  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-07-05 13:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-20  9:03 another way to shoot yourself in the foot? fedya_fedyakoff
2008-06-20  9:34 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-06-20  9:48   ` fedya_fedyakoff
2008-06-20 10:01     ` Ludovic Brenta
2008-06-20 10:05 ` christoph.grein
2008-06-20 10:26   ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-06-20 16:12     ` Adam Beneschan
2008-06-20 15:48   ` Adam Beneschan
2008-06-20 19:27   ` Robert A Duff
2008-06-20 23:37     ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2008-06-21  8:56       ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-06-22 20:44         ` Robert A Duff
2008-06-23  7:49           ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-06-24  4:02             ` george.priv
2008-06-24  7:30               ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-06-24 17:16                 ` Robert A Duff
2008-06-24 19:15                   ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2008-06-24 20:31                     ` Robert A Duff
2008-06-24 20:50                       ` Ludovic Brenta
2008-06-24 23:02                         ` Robert A Duff
2008-06-24 23:42                         ` Georg Bauhaus
2008-06-24 21:24                       ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2008-06-24 23:24                         ` Robert A Duff
2008-06-25 15:07                       ` Adam Beneschan
2008-06-24 14:59             ` Adam Beneschan
2008-06-24 16:41               ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-06-24 17:20                 ` Robert A Duff
2008-06-24 17:52                   ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-06-24 23:35                     ` Georg Bauhaus
2008-06-25  8:09                       ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-06-25 10:32                         ` Georg Bauhaus
2008-06-25 12:06                           ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-06-22 20:37       ` Robert A Duff
2008-06-22 21:25         ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2008-07-04 20:52           ` Colin Paul Gloster
2008-07-04 22:15             ` (see below)
2008-07-05 16:06               ` Colin Paul Gloster
2008-07-05 13:38             ` Gary Scott [this message]
2008-07-05 16:42               ` Colin Paul Gloster
2008-07-05 19:00                 ` Gary Scott
2008-07-09 19:39                   ` Colin Paul Gloster
2008-07-09 20:35                     ` Richard Maine
2008-07-09 22:49                       ` Terence
2008-07-10  1:07                         ` Gary Scott
2008-07-10 14:10                       ` Colin Paul Gloster
2008-07-10 14:57                         ` fj
2008-07-10 16:47                           ` Richard Maine
2008-07-10 17:03                         ` Dick Hendrickson
2008-07-10 17:26                           ` Craig Powers
2008-07-10 19:55                             ` James Giles
2008-07-10 20:45                               ` Dick Hendrickson
2008-07-10 21:22                                 ` Richard Maine
2008-07-10 21:29                                   ` Craig Powers
2008-07-10 20:45                               ` Craig Powers
2008-07-10 19:51                           ` James Giles
2008-07-11 15:02                             ` Colin Paul Gloster
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox