From: Gary Scott <garylscott@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: another way to shoot yourself in the foot?
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 08:38:50 -0500
Date: 2008-07-05T08:38:50-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <NPKbk.14568$N87.10457@nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <g4m2gb$3b3$1@registered.motzarella.org>
Colin Paul Gloster wrote:
> Jeffrey R. Carter <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.acm.org> wrote in message
> news:brz7k.167222$TT4.46081@attbi_s22 ...
> |------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> |" Robert A Duff wrote:
> |
> |[..]
> |
> |
> |
> |> As Dmitry pointed out, with this idea, there's no need for the "return
> |
> |> Result;".
> |
> |
> |
> | True, but I find it easier to understand the function if it has the
> explicit |
> | "return Result;","
> |
> |------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>
> I believe that "return Result;" is fine. It is true that it is not
> necessary, in much the same way that IN is redundant for a function's
> mode. Some people had criticized IN for a function for the same
> reason, but people who use many languages (or instead, who do not
> program much) should not be forced to memorize all the ramifications
> of particular language semantics if a piece of excess syntax makes it
> clear for them.
>
> |------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> |" even though I came to Ada from a Pascal background."
> |
> |------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>
> Speaking of which, after my unsuccessful job application to you
> earlier this year (thank you for having the decency to treat my
> application properly though, as did other some contributors to this
> newsgroup when I applied to them, but unfortunately a number of others
> were disrespectful) I very recently joined a group of people who on
> average do not work predominantly as programmers. The languages which
> I have been told are in some of their backgrounds are FORTRAN and C++,
> and we have FORTRAN and C++ codebases which I should improve. How
> better to start than by porting to Ada!?
Or Fortran 95 or Fortran 2003 (ok, 2003 is nearly available)
<snip>
> Regards,
> Colin Paul Gloster
>
>
--
Gary Scott
mailto:garylscott@sbcglobal dot net
Fortran Library: http://www.fortranlib.com
Support the Original G95 Project: http://www.g95.org
-OR-
Support the GNU GFortran Project: http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/index.html
If you want to do the impossible, don't hire an expert because he knows
it can't be done.
-- Henry Ford
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-05 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-20 9:03 another way to shoot yourself in the foot? fedya_fedyakoff
2008-06-20 9:34 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-06-20 9:48 ` fedya_fedyakoff
2008-06-20 10:01 ` Ludovic Brenta
2008-06-20 10:05 ` christoph.grein
2008-06-20 10:26 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-06-20 16:12 ` Adam Beneschan
2008-06-20 15:48 ` Adam Beneschan
2008-06-20 19:27 ` Robert A Duff
2008-06-20 23:37 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2008-06-21 8:56 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-06-22 20:44 ` Robert A Duff
2008-06-23 7:49 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-06-24 4:02 ` george.priv
2008-06-24 7:30 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-06-24 17:16 ` Robert A Duff
2008-06-24 19:15 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2008-06-24 20:31 ` Robert A Duff
2008-06-24 20:50 ` Ludovic Brenta
2008-06-24 23:02 ` Robert A Duff
2008-06-24 23:42 ` Georg Bauhaus
2008-06-24 21:24 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2008-06-24 23:24 ` Robert A Duff
2008-06-25 15:07 ` Adam Beneschan
2008-06-24 14:59 ` Adam Beneschan
2008-06-24 16:41 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-06-24 17:20 ` Robert A Duff
2008-06-24 17:52 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-06-24 23:35 ` Georg Bauhaus
2008-06-25 8:09 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-06-25 10:32 ` Georg Bauhaus
2008-06-25 12:06 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-06-22 20:37 ` Robert A Duff
2008-06-22 21:25 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2008-07-04 20:52 ` Colin Paul Gloster
2008-07-04 22:15 ` (see below)
2008-07-05 16:06 ` Colin Paul Gloster
2008-07-05 13:38 ` Gary Scott [this message]
2008-07-05 16:42 ` Colin Paul Gloster
2008-07-05 19:00 ` Gary Scott
2008-07-09 19:39 ` Colin Paul Gloster
2008-07-09 20:35 ` Richard Maine
2008-07-09 22:49 ` Terence
2008-07-10 1:07 ` Gary Scott
2008-07-10 14:10 ` Colin Paul Gloster
2008-07-10 14:57 ` fj
2008-07-10 16:47 ` Richard Maine
2008-07-10 17:03 ` Dick Hendrickson
2008-07-10 17:26 ` Craig Powers
2008-07-10 19:55 ` James Giles
2008-07-10 20:45 ` Dick Hendrickson
2008-07-10 21:22 ` Richard Maine
2008-07-10 21:29 ` Craig Powers
2008-07-10 20:45 ` Craig Powers
2008-07-10 19:51 ` James Giles
2008-07-11 15:02 ` Colin Paul Gloster
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox