From: Shark8 <OneWingedShark@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Strange error message
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 12:39:36 -0600
Date: 2014-06-02T12:39:36-06:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Mx3jv.965315$k7.585931@fx20.iad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <wcc38fn5sme.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
On 02-Jun-14 07:49, Robert A Duff wrote:
> In fact, private parts should not exist; that stuff belongs in the body.
I'm not sure I agree -- it would be the ideal case, yes... but the
private part can, and should [IMO] be used to convey information that
isn't, strictly-speaking, required for the specification but /is/ for
interfacing. eg: the size of a private-type, import, convention, etc.
Granted. virtually all of those are [in Ada 2012] fairly obsolescent
with the aspect mechanism there are some that are not covered
(record-representations and enumeration-value specifications come
immediately to mind).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-02 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-01 10:24 Strange error message Charly
2014-06-01 11:11 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2014-06-01 12:50 ` Charly
2014-06-01 13:54 ` Simon Wright
2014-06-01 21:18 ` Robert A Duff
2014-06-02 7:47 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2014-06-02 13:49 ` Robert A Duff
2014-06-02 14:55 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2014-06-02 17:24 ` Robert A Duff
2014-06-02 18:39 ` Shark8 [this message]
2014-06-02 19:56 ` Randy Brukardt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-13 10:36 strange " evangeli
2002-11-13 15:05 ` Stephen Leake
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox