From: Mats.Weber@matrix.ch (Mats Weber)
Subject: Re: Top 10 Ada myths
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 1995 20:22:50 GMT
Date: 1995-03-20T20:22:50+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Mats.Weber-2003952122500001@mlma11.matrix.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: EACHUS.95Mar20113605@spectre.mitre.org
In article <EACHUS.95Mar20113605@spectre.mitre.org>,
eachus@spectre.mitre.org (Robert I. Eachus) wrote:
> [...] (Of course, the
> moment anything in this field is "finished," you find errors and bugs.
> But Ada 95 has been much, much better than Ada 83 in this regard [...]
How do you know ? There isn't even a complete compiler around. I think
certain bugs in the Ada 95 definition will only come up as the language
gets implemented.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1995-03-20 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1995-03-16 16:33 Top 10 Ada myths Paul Pukite
1995-03-17 14:15 ` Norman H. Cohen
1995-03-20 16:36 ` Robert I. Eachus
1995-03-20 20:22 ` Mats Weber [this message]
1995-03-21 1:57 ` David Weller
1995-03-23 0:02 ` Quoting the RM (was Re: Top 10 Ada myths) Robert I. Eachus
1995-03-21 20:55 ` Top 10 Ada myths Robert I. Eachus
1995-03-23 5:51 ` Robert Dewar
1995-03-23 16:52 ` Robert I. Eachus
1995-03-24 6:11 ` Readability of manual (was Re: Top 10 Ada myths) Dan Johnston D.B.
1995-03-21 21:31 ` Top 10 Ada myths Robert Dewar
1995-03-23 0:17 ` Robert I. Eachus
1995-03-17 19:43 ` Chris Reedy
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox