Re: a good book to start with?

["Stephane Richard" <stephane.richard@verizon.net>]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 982 bytes --]

That would be it's first point :-).  I just like to let others mention it
themselves.  hehehe

-- 
St�phane Richard
"Ada World" Webmaster
http://www.adaworld.com


"Olivier Laurent" <oliderid@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:8d63e22a.0310080744.2d292add@posting.google.com...
> "Stephane Richard" <stephane.richard@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:<DIRgb.36419$541.30979@nwrdny02.gnilink.net>...
>
> > Me well I simply prefer Ada for more than one reason.  Mainly because it
> > still detects more errors at compile time than Java can, which means
that by
> > the time yoru code compiles, there's:
> > 1. a much higher change it will run
> > 2. a much smaller debugging time from the coding to the end of debugging
> > phase.
>
> Well I'ven't enough experience and knowledge to follow you on that
> way. But with  my humble perspective...ADA is "much" easier to read
> than C++ family.
>
> Eh...I mean you just need to read it to understand what's going on.
>
>
> Olivier