From: Peter C. Chapin <pchapin@sover.net>
Subject: Re: Naming convention for classes?
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 02:31:29 GMT
Date: 2004-02-04T02:31:29+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MPG.1a8a2399b416094998968f@news.sover.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: G%WTb.12124$uM2.2382@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net
In article <G%WTb.12124$uM2.2382@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
spam@spam.com says...
> Is this a troll? You'll find ample discussion of this (naming types and
> packages) if you search c.l.a at groups.google.com. Some people are very
> attached to one approach or the other.
Okay, so in other words either approach is considered acceptable by the
community at large. It's a matter of style. At least that's the
impression I get from your reply. Does that sound like a fair
assessment?
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-04 2:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-03 23:52 Naming convention for classes? Peter C. Chapin
2004-02-04 0:27 ` Jeffrey Carter
2004-02-04 2:31 ` Peter C. Chapin [this message]
2004-02-04 8:57 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2004-02-04 11:52 ` Peter C. Chapin
2004-02-04 14:02 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2004-02-05 12:18 ` Stuart Palin
2004-02-04 14:13 ` Martin Krischik
2004-02-04 9:13 ` Preben Randhol
2004-02-04 14:57 ` Georg Bauhaus
2004-02-04 19:01 ` Jeffrey Carter
2004-02-04 8:06 ` tmoran
2004-02-04 11:49 ` Peter C. Chapin
2004-02-04 12:36 ` Preben Randhol
2004-02-04 12:41 ` Preben Randhol
2004-02-04 14:09 ` Martin Krischik
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox