Re: Gnat.Sockets and non-blocking connects

[Jano <nono@celes.unizar.es>]

Samuel Tardieu dice...
> >>>>> "Florian" == Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> writes:
> 
> Florian> It's EINPROGRESS.  Pretty informative, isn't it?
> 
> It's never EINPROGRESS if you wait until the corresponding bit is set
> by select in the write set.

It's never EINPROGRESS in my experience: the first time is "would 
block", following times is another one (invalid parameter I seem to 
remember but I'm not sure; certainly nothing like "in progress").

Checking for writing is ok for connects that succeed. For failed ones, 
you must check another thing. The windows SDK says to check for 
exception condition in select. Checking for reading or writing doesn't 
reveal the failure.

-- 
-------------------------
Jano
402450.at.cepsz.unizar.es
-------------------------