From: Jano <nono@celes.unizar.es>
Subject: Re: Tasks unleashed
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 18:30:27 +0200
Date: 2003-05-01T18:30:27+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MPG.191b6a092af37f859896f2@News.CIS.DFN.DE> (raw)
In-Reply-To: wccbrymej9l.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com
Robert A Duff dice...
> Nonetheless, I would consider it a bug to fail to free a task that is
> both terminated and U_D'ed. What happens if you put a "delay" in the
> loop?
Increasingly consumed memory. I have put a 0.1 delay.
> > What things could arise from that?
>
> Bad things. ;-)
I'm doomed... XD
--
-------------------------
Jano
402450.at.cepsz.unizar.es
-------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-01 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-01 14:01 Tasks unleashed Jano
2003-05-01 15:40 ` Stephen Leake
2003-05-01 16:14 ` Robert A Duff
2003-05-01 16:30 ` Jano [this message]
2003-05-02 1:14 ` tmoran
2003-05-02 11:21 ` Jano
2003-05-02 23:52 ` tmoran
2003-05-11 5:35 ` Craig Carey
2003-05-11 15:35 ` Pascal Obry
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox