From: Jano <402450@cepsz.unizar.es>
Subject: Re: JVM News
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 17:25:51 +0100
Date: 2003-02-14T17:25:51+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MPG.18b736fcce774329989697@News.CIS.DFN.DE> (raw)
In-Reply-To: b2ir4p$a4$1@slb3.atl.mindspring.net
En el mensaje <b2ir4p$a4$1@slb3.atl.mindspring.net>,
mcondic.auntie.spam@acm.org dice...
> 35-40 meg for a "Hello World" app? That seems to be a number so extreme as
> to be highly questionable. Are they talking about the size of the Java Byte
> Code or are they talking about the the total size of the entire Java
> environment necessary to run a "Hello World" app? The former is really hard
> to believe and the latter might be a bit of an unfair criticism. (Would a
> "Hello World" app written for Windows have to count all of Windows as part
> of its "footprint"?)
I understand the latter. But they also say that's not totally unfair
because if you are in a shared machine -for example at my school, isn't
inusual that 30 or 40 students make a practice over the same machine via
xterms- then every java apprentice trying his "hello world" will require
40 megs. And if the program is not a trivial one the footprint quickly
grows.
Yes, one can better share the JVM, but if you want different
applications to be completely isolated to prevent one bringing down
another...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-14 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-07 22:57 JVM News achrist
2003-02-13 16:36 ` Craig Carey
2003-02-14 13:31 ` Marin David Condic
2003-02-14 16:25 ` Jano [this message]
2003-02-16 12:09 ` Florian Weimer
2003-02-16 0:18 ` Richard Riehle
2003-02-16 0:40 ` Samuel Tardieu
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-16 0:55 Alexandre E. Kopilovitch
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox