From: Martin Dowie <martin.dowie@btopenworld.com>
Subject: Re: ANN: Ada source code decorator
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 18:50:24 +0100
Date: 2006-05-30T18:50:24+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MP6dnXxP5NF8GOHZRVnygw@bt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2ejyg5xth.fsf@grendel.local>
Simon Wright wrote:
> In the reverse direction, given a UML model, are you going to map a
> Class to a package? to a tagged type? Either would be valid ... (and
> would have its own difficulties).
I've never understood this view point - a UML class is (to me) clearly
an Ada publicly tagged type. If you are using UML classes you are
explicitly "OO".
If you don't want OO then you can always add functions/procedures to
packages (or at least you can in some UML tools ;-).
Cheers
-- Martin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-30 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-23 10:59 ANN: Ada source code decorator Georg Bauhaus
2006-05-23 21:01 ` Simon Wright
2006-05-25 0:28 ` Stephen Leake
2006-05-25 4:54 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-05-25 12:36 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-05-25 13:48 ` Stephen Leake
2006-05-25 16:16 ` Manuel Collado
2006-05-26 5:54 ` Martin Krischik
2006-05-26 11:08 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-05-26 20:35 ` Simon Wright
2006-05-27 8:59 ` Martin Krischik
2006-05-27 11:25 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-05-27 12:13 ` Martin Krischik
2006-05-27 12:06 ` Simon Wright
2006-05-30 17:50 ` Martin Dowie [this message]
2006-05-25 19:53 ` Simon Wright
2006-05-26 11:24 ` Stephen Leake
2006-05-26 21:01 ` Simon Wright
2006-05-27 11:51 ` Stephen Leake
2006-05-27 17:38 ` Simon Wright
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox