From: "SteveD" <nospam_steved94@attbi.com>
Subject: Re: have to use unrestricted access but just what about access
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 12:10:20 GMT
Date: 2002-06-20T12:10:20+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MCjQ8.88050$R61.31045@rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 0x8Q8.6779$ZP1.1263481@news11-gui.server.ntli.net
"chris.danx" <spamoff.danx@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:0x8Q8.6779$ZP1.1263481@news11-gui.server.ntli.net...
> Hi,
>
> How can the unrestricted_access attribute be replaced by just access in
the
> following code?
>
You didn't provide enough code in your example to answer the question.
Namely where your structure is defined. If it is defined inside a procedure
you'll need Unchecked_Access (although Unrestricted_Access will work).
SteveD
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-20 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-19 23:32 have to use unrestricted access but just what about access chris.danx
2002-06-20 8:41 ` chris.danx
2002-06-20 12:10 ` SteveD [this message]
2002-06-20 14:22 ` Robert A Duff
2002-06-21 11:45 ` Robert Dewar
2002-06-22 0:49 ` Robert A Duff
2002-06-22 1:05 ` Ted Dennison
2002-06-22 12:09 ` Robert Dewar
2002-07-20 4:59 ` Craig Carey
2002-07-20 17:47 ` Robert A Duff
2002-07-21 8:45 ` Craig Carey
2002-06-20 16:05 ` Robert Dewar
2002-06-20 17:11 ` chris.danx
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox