Differances in Ada and C++ on Sin and Cos

Differances in Ada and C++ on Sin and Cos

[ich_bin_elvis]

Hi,

Does ada and C++ treat Cos and Sin functions different? I know arctan
and atan behaves different. But it seams like there is an different
behavior on the same program code written in ada and C++ on cos and sin
also. is there other functions  that behaves deifferent that I should
be aware of?

Regards
Ronny

Re: Differances in Ada and C++ on Sin and Cos

[Marius Amado Alves]

> Does ada and C++ treat Cos and Sin functions different? I know arctan
> and atan behaves different. But it seams like there is an different
> behavior on the same program code written in ada and C++ on cos and sin
> also.

I'd be very surprised--and frightened--if the differences were not in 
precision only.

Re: Differances in Ada and C++ on Sin and Cos

[Dmitry A. Kazakov]

On 13 Apr 2005 04:50:07 -0700, ich_bin_elvis@hotmail.com wrote:

> Does ada and C++ treat Cos and Sin functions different?

In Ada there are two variants of Cos/Sin, one of them has the argument
specified in terms of cycle, which may differ from the standard
mathematical definition (e.g. 2 Pi.) Do you mean this?

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de

Re: Differances in Ada and C++ on Sin and Cos

[Jeffrey Carter]

ich_bin_elvis@hotmail.com wrote:

> Does ada and C++ treat Cos and Sin functions different? I know arctan
> and atan behaves different. But it seams like there is an different
> behavior on the same program code written in ada and C++ on cos and sin
> also. is there other functions  that behaves deifferent that I should
> be aware of?

Ada generally requires greater accuracy from the elementary functions 
than other languages. ARM A.5.1 says

"The results of the Sin, Cos, Tan, and Cot functions with specified 
cycle are exact when the mathematical result is zero; those of the first 
two are also exact when the mathematical result is � 1.0."

A compiler that implements the Numerics Annex will also abide by the 
accuracy requirements of ARM G.2.4 (at least in strict mode, which may 
be the default mode; see ARM G.2). These can be difficult to read 
sometimes. I find

"The maximum relative error exhibited by each function is as follows:

     2.0 � EF.Float_Type'Model_Epsilon, in the case of the Sqrt, Sin, 
and Cos functions"

"The absolute value of the result of the Sin, Cos, and Tanh functions 
never exceeds one."

specific to Sin and Cos.

Note that for GNAT 3.15p, which completely implements the Numerics 
Annex, strict mode is the default and only mode for the elementary 
functions. This is probably true for later versions of GNAT as well.

-- 
Jeff Carter
"Apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine,
public order, irrigation, roads, the fresh water system,
and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?"
Monty Python's Life of Brian
80