From: matt@physics7.berkeley.edu (Matt Austern)
Subject: Re: C++ not OOP? (Was: Language Efficiency
Date: 1995/04/20
Date: 1995-04-20T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MATT.95Apr19233944@physics7.berkeley.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3n0uvi$8jt@atlantis.utmb.edu
In article <3n43p0$ehs@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM> dweller@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM (David Weller) writes:
> >If I can write a procedure that is NOT attached to an object,
> >then I am NOT using a "PURE" OOPL.
> >
> Curtis, please cite the references you have used to gain this silly
> notion.
Who needs a definition? It's apparently his definition of the word
"pure". Definitions are arbitrary; he can define the phrase
"pure object-oriented language" however he feels like.
The rest of us, of course, don't have to accept that the way he
distinguishes between "pure" and "impure" languages is a particularly
useful distinction. Personally, I don't. I think that this
distinction is almost completely trivial: whether or not functions
must always be attached to classes is an essentially syntactic issue.
--
Matt Austern matt@physics.berkeley.edu
http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1995-04-20 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1995-04-02 0:00 Language Efficiency Robert C. Bethel
1995-04-04 0:00 ` Harold P Zbiegien
1995-04-04 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-04 0:00 ` Kennel
1995-04-05 0:00 ` Ray Toal
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-19 0:00 ` Fergus Henderson
1995-04-19 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-20 0:00 ` Kennel
1995-04-19 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
[not found] ` <3m9o9q$igf@stc06.ctd.ornl.gov>
[not found] ` <D6ss6z.Gvw@mcshub.dcss.mcmaster.ca>
[not found] ` <dewar.797512974@gnat>
1995-04-19 0:00 ` Adam Beneschan
1995-04-19 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
[not found] ` <3mbmd5$s06@icebox.mfltd.co.uk>
[not found] ` <D6uA77.Lqp@mcshub.dcss.mcmaster.ca>
[not found] ` <dewar.797566928@gnat>
[not found] ` <D6vxDG.JKJ@mcshub.dcss.mcmaster.ca>
[not found] ` <dewar.797636710@gnat>
[not found] ` <D6xF22.38H@mcshub.dcss.mcmaster.ca>
[not found] ` <dewar.797729041@gnat>
[not found] ` <3msdop$862@stc06.ctd.ornl.gov>
1995-04-19 0:00 ` Paul Graham
1995-04-19 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
[not found] ` <3mcfbf$psl@acmez.gatech.edu>
[not found] ` <3mgnkc$e3j@atlantis <3muaif$46u@atlantis.utmb.edu>
[not found] ` <3n0lsu$nio@druid.borland.com>
[not found] ` <3n0uvi$8jt@atlantis.utmb.edu>
1995-04-19 0:00 ` C++ not OOP? (Was: " Fernando Mato Mira
1995-04-19 0:00 ` Curtis Bass
1995-04-19 0:00 ` David Weller
1995-04-20 0:00 ` Curtis Bass
1995-04-20 0:00 ` David Weller
1995-04-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-21 0:00 ` Curtis Bass
1995-04-21 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-20 0:00 ` Curtis Bass
1995-04-21 0:00 ` Robert Martin
1995-04-21 0:00 ` Ed Osinski
1995-04-21 0:00 ` Fernando Mato Mira
1995-04-21 0:00 ` Robert Martin
1995-04-20 0:00 ` Matt Austern [this message]
1995-04-21 0:00 ` Ed Osinski
1995-04-21 0:00 ` Robert Martin
1995-04-21 0:00 ` Curtis Bass
1995-04-21 0:00 ` Matt Austern
1995-04-22 0:00 ` Robert Martin
1995-04-22 0:00 ` OOAD courses by Object Mentor cjames
1995-04-22 0:00 ` C++ not OOP? (Was: Language Efficiency David Weller
1995-04-21 0:00 ` Robert Martin
1995-04-21 0:00 ` Curtis Bass
[not found] ` <3mgnkc$e3j@atlantis.utmb.edu>
[not found] ` <1995Apr13.180317.3308@rcmcon.com>
[not found] ` <3muaif$46u@atlantis.utmb.edu>
1995-04-21 0:00 ` Robert Martin
1995-04-21 0:00 ` Curtis Bass
1995-04-21 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-22 0:00 ` Robert Martin
[not found] ` <3mk65q$1kti@watnews1.watson.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <3muavq$46u@atlantis.utmb.edu>
1995-04-21 0:00 ` Norman H. Cohen
1995-04-21 0:00 ` Curtis Bass
[not found] ` <3mcoh6$add@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM>
[not found] ` <3mdrpf$3o9@disunms.epfl.ch>
[not found] ` <dewar.797608300@gnat>
[not found] ` <3mg45s$5r7@disunms.epfl.ch>
[not found] ` <3mjc8c$630@crcnis3.unl.edu>
[not found] ` <D71Gs9.2FG@nntpa.cb.att.com>
[not found] ` <EACHUS.95Apr17162921@spectre.mitre.org>
[not found] ` <3n1als$ksi@no-names.nerdc.ufl.edu>
1995-04-19 0:00 ` Multiple dispatch (was Re: C++ not OOP?) Fernando Mato Mira
[not found] ` <1995Apr13.152104@di.epfl.ch>
1995-04-21 0:00 ` C++ not OOP? (Was: Language Efficiency James McKim
1995-04-19 0:00 ` Harley Davis
1995-04-19 0:00 ` Multiple dispatch (was Re: C++ not OOP?) Kenneth Almquist
1995-04-19 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
[not found] ` <MATT.95Apr17124932@physics10.berkeley.edu>
[not found] ` <3mujnl$4u8@atlantis.utmb.edu>
1995-04-20 0:00 ` C++ not OOP? (Was: Language Efficiency ron house
1995-04-21 0:00 ` Robert Martin
1995-04-21 0:00 ` Curtis Bass
1995-04-21 0:00 ` Multiple dispatch (was Re: C++ not OOP?) Robert I. Eachus
1995-04-21 0:00 ` C++ not OOP? (Was: Language Efficiency Norman H. Cohen
1995-04-21 0:00 ` Fernando Mato Mira
1995-04-21 0:00 ` Erik Naggum
[not found] ` <dewar.797469506@gnat>
[not found] ` <1995Apr10.095958@di.epfl.ch>
[not found] ` <dewar.797513130@gnat>
[not found] ` <1995Apr10.165638@di.epfl.ch>
[not found] ` <D6yGqv.4BG@nntpa.cb.att.com>
1995-04-21 0:00 ` Fergus Henderson
1995-04-22 0:00 ` Kenneth Almquist
1995-04-20 0:00 ` Matt Austern
1995-04-21 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
1995-04-04 0:00 ` Bob Kitzberger
1995-04-05 0:00 ` Mike Wilson
1995-04-05 0:00 ` David Weller
1995-04-05 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1995-04-05 0:00 ` Lawrence Free/ A.F. Software Services
1995-04-05 0:00 ` Mitch Gart
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Ken Leidner
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1995-04-20 0:00 C++ not OOP? (Was: " Wes Groleau
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox