From: "Steve" <nospam_steved94@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Interoperability: differing storage units and/or endianess
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 05:34:36 GMT
Date: 2004-02-21T05:34:36+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <M5CZb.93323$uV3.558411@attbi_s51> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 9fb7e8e1.0402190429.49b37b16@posting.google.com
Check out:
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1832.txt
For a description of XDR.
It is close to what we use for specifying data in our distributed
application.
Steve
(The Duck)
"Bibb Latting" <bibb.latting@cox.net> wrote in message
news:9fb7e8e1.0402190429.49b37b16@posting.google.com...
> Hi, I am working on a distributed application where the processors
> have differing storage unit sizes and/or endianess. My problem is how
> to handle the specification of memory contents and the delivery of
> data to applications with minimal variation between implementations.
> I'd like to know what solutions have worked well for others.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-21 5:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-19 12:29 Interoperability: differing storage units and/or endianess Bibb Latting
2004-02-19 17:23 ` Jeffrey Carter
2004-02-20 13:52 ` Martin Dowie
2004-02-20 7:41 ` Michael Paus
2004-02-20 8:56 ` Stephen Leake
2004-02-20 10:54 ` Michael Paus
2004-02-20 13:55 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2004-02-20 12:43 ` Petter Fryklund
2004-02-20 20:24 ` Randy Brukardt
2004-02-21 5:34 ` Steve [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox