From: Stapler <spam.magnet@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: A tiny little integer stack package from a novice.
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 18:54:35 GMT
Date: 2002-11-25T18:54:35+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <LluE9.112295$P31.56575@rwcrnsc53> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1ec946d1.0211250931.341c1a32@posting.google.com
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002 12:31:57 -0500, Matthew Heaney wrote:
>
> Why is this a generic package? Why isn't this an abstract data type?
Good question. Good point. As I said, I'm a real newb, so I hadn't
really considered using an abstract data type. That makes sense.
> If the stack has a fixed, maximum size, it's easier to simply declare it
> as a discriminated record, which avoids all the headaches associated
> with memory allocation. For example:
>
Good thinking. I'm reworking the package as per your advice and that of
Mr. Grein in an earlier post.
It's gonna look so much better.
Stapler
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-25 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-25 7:19 A tiny little integer stack package from a novice Stapler
2002-11-25 17:31 ` Matthew Heaney
2002-11-25 18:54 ` Stapler [this message]
2002-11-25 19:21 ` Jeffrey Carter
2002-11-25 21:40 ` tmoran
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-25 7:33 Grein, Christoph
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox