From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: profiler
Date: 27 Oct 2003 17:01:36 -0600
Date: 2003-10-27T17:01:36-06:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Lf2BI96wUtd9@eisner.encompasserve.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: uptgid292.fsf@nasa.gov
In article <uptgid292.fsf@nasa.gov>, Stephen Leake <Stephe.Leake@nasa.gov> writes:
> But why are you profiling a non-specific compiler? Profiling is only
> necessary when you have a performance problem;
Profiling to let you know how much time is spent in various routines
and shareable images can be used to characterize a workload, when one
does not have better tools.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-27 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-24 9:21 profiler Peter Hermann
2003-10-24 10:07 ` profiler Marius Amado Alves
2003-10-24 11:26 ` profiler Jeff C,
2003-10-25 2:50 ` profiler Steve
2003-10-27 8:57 ` profiler Peter Hermann
2003-10-27 11:39 ` profiler Larry Kilgallen
2003-10-27 12:27 ` profiler Peter Hermann
2003-10-27 12:29 ` profiler Jeff C,
2003-10-27 13:35 ` profiler Larry Kilgallen
2003-10-27 12:00 ` profiler Jeff C,
2003-10-27 17:22 ` profiler Stephen Leake
2003-10-27 23:01 ` Larry Kilgallen [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-27 15:19 profiler Beard, Frank Randolph CIV
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox