* Re: Can't control COM port pins in DOS Window [not found] <QUMx4.15586$W5.196264@typhoon.nyroc.rr.com> @ 2000-03-10 0:00 ` tmoran 2000-03-10 0:00 ` IGNORE " tmoran 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: tmoran @ 2000-03-10 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) >However, although it runs fine under plain DOS, it will *not* make the pin >voltages change when run in a DOS window in Windows 98. Sounds like Windows 98 is keeping control over that hardware resource and not letting your program touch it. Does your program run OK under Windows 95? Note also that the virtualizing makes IO commands run much much slower. Does timing matter to your program? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* IGNORE Re: Can't control COM port pins in DOS Window 2000-03-10 0:00 ` Can't control COM port pins in DOS Window tmoran @ 2000-03-10 0:00 ` tmoran 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: tmoran @ 2000-03-10 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) Sorry, wrong newsgroup. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-03-10 0:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <QUMx4.15586$W5.196264@typhoon.nyroc.rr.com>
2000-03-10 0:00 ` Can't control COM port pins in DOS Window tmoran
2000-03-10 0:00 ` IGNORE " tmoran
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox