From: tmoran@acm.org
Subject: Re: Problem with intertask comm
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:41:31 GMT
Date: 2001-04-12T23:41:31+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <L2rB6.12043$ix4.9467326@news1.rdc1.sfba.home.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3ad62703$0$190$456d72a3@news.skynet.be
>listener to a sender... the tasks thus have to be on the same level of scope
>to be assigned a reference to each other, or am I wrong?
And why can't you put them at the same level?
>> you must be able to certify that the object can't possibly ever be used
As T.E.D. pointed out, requiring an Unchecked_Access is not just the
compiler trying to be difficult. If you use it you are taking full
responsibility that the program won't try to use a pointer that's
pointing into the weeds. Don't do it unless you must, and safely can.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-12 23:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-12 17:58 Problem with intertask comm Tom De Muer
2001-04-12 18:38 ` tmoran
2001-04-12 21:38 ` Ted Dennison
2001-04-12 22:06 ` Tom De Muer
2001-04-12 23:41 ` tmoran [this message]
2001-04-13 13:28 ` Ted Dennison
2001-04-13 17:10 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox