From: tmoran@acm.org
Subject: Re: Private area and child packages
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 22:47:01 -0600
Date: 2004-12-28T22:47:01-06:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <KeOdnZyGYP5Yq0_cRVn-tg@comcast.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1104293158.276241.42640@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com
How about renaming Some_Package.Child_Package to
Some_Package_Child_Package, ie, don't make it a child package.
The usual reason for making something a child package is to allow it
visibility into the parent, which is exactly what you don't want here.
So for what reason are you using the child package mechanism?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-29 4:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-29 4:05 Private area and child packages danmcleran
2004-12-29 4:47 ` tmoran [this message]
2004-12-29 15:10 ` danmcleran
2004-12-30 18:51 ` tmoran
2005-01-01 3:45 ` danmcleran
2004-12-29 4:49 ` Jeffrey Carter
2004-12-29 15:27 ` danmcleran
2004-12-29 16:53 ` Samuel Tardieu
2004-12-30 4:07 ` Jeffrey Carter
2004-12-30 15:31 ` danmcleran
2004-12-30 18:14 ` Jeffrey Carter
2004-12-31 17:55 ` danmcleran
[not found] ` <1104515735.052116.248180@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
2004-12-31 19:02 ` Jeffrey Carter
2004-12-29 19:05 ` Martin Krischik
2004-12-29 21:44 ` Stephen Leake
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox