From: "Rajagopalan Srinivasan" <r.srinivasan@worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Is JGNAT production ready?...
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 03:08:26 GMT
Date: 2001-01-04T03:08:26+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <KOR46.1469$fj6.115558@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3a53bed0_3@news3.prserv.net
Will you be a "supported" customer?
There is little to no support to be had for jgnat "public" free version.
HTH
"Andrzej Lewandowski" <lewandoREMOVE@attglobal.net> wrote in message
news:3a53bed0_3@news3.prserv.net...
> I am working on some Java application that is heavily using threads.
> Programming multithreaded applications in Java is, ehem... sorry...
> no fun. Therefore, I have undusted my Ada83 skills, upgraded to 95
> and I am thinking about using JGNAT for this part of application that
> uses threads, with the rest in plain Java.
>
> This is commercial application, and I have no room for mistakes.
> Mistakes would be expensive. Therefore, the question(s): what is the
> quality of JGNAT? Is here anybody who has experience with using
> JGNAT for medium-size real life projects? Linking JGNAT modules
> with Java modules? Quality of JGNAT threads?...
>
> Other question: is GNU JGNAT as good/bad as the commercial version
> of JGNAT? Are they the same JGNATs?...
>
> Andrzej Lewandowski
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-04 3:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-04 1:03 Is JGNAT production ready? Andrzej Lewandowski
2001-01-04 3:08 ` Rajagopalan Srinivasan [this message]
2001-01-04 18:01 ` Andrzej Lewandowski
2001-01-04 20:42 ` Rob Veenker
2001-01-06 14:33 ` Pascal Obry
2001-01-07 2:25 ` Andrzej Lewandowski
2001-01-07 4:00 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-07 10:08 ` Pascal Obry
2001-01-07 14:35 ` David Botton
2001-01-07 5:36 ` tmoran
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox