From: Ted Dennison<dennison@telepath.com>
Subject: Re: Which OO is in ??
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 13:31:22 GMT
Date: 2001-08-03T13:31:22+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <KIxa7.16176$ar1.58624@www.newsranger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3b6a97c5@pull.gecm.com
In article <3b6a97c5@pull.gecm.com>, Martin Dowie says...
>
>I think the original poster is asking what method he would use
>together with UML (if that were the notation chosen).
>
>For UML you have at least RUP, ROPES, RtP Mentor and god only
>knows how many more methods. At least one per tool vendor!
Some tool vendors just provide UML, and don't stilt things towards any
particular process. We used ObjectTeam, which has now morphed into Telelogic TAU
I believe. For a process, we used "Texel-Williams", which is Use-Case and UML
based.
>But I'm sorry I don't know which one is the 'de facto' standard. :-(
Not that I've seen. Perhaps a shakeout will come.
---
T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html
home email - mailto:dennison@telepath.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-03 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-02 16:51 Which OO is in ?? Paul Foster
2001-08-02 17:10 ` Ted Dennison
2001-08-02 18:02 ` Paul Foster
2001-08-03 9:27 ` Hambut
2001-08-03 12:33 ` Martin Dowie
2001-08-03 13:31 ` Ted Dennison [this message]
2001-08-03 20:28 ` Hambut
2001-08-06 13:25 ` Martin Dowie
2001-08-03 18:00 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2001-08-04 10:30 ` Shayne Flint
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox