From: "Kevin K" <kevink4@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: exception access violation
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 23:43:01 GMT
Date: 2006-11-15T23:43:01+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <KIRoJuEXw9g9-pn2-s53s245pSdC6@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1163584330.6500.6.camel@localhost.localdomain
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 09:52:10 UTC, Georg Bauhaus
<bauhaus@futureapps.de> wrote:
> Why is using the heap + controlled for larger data structures
> more portable than using the stack? I
Some operating systems put smaller than you would expect limitations
on the environment stack. And while you can change it in some cases,
while playing around, I found that Mac OSX, for example, seemed to
have a 16MB limit (going by memory). And since task stacks were put
on this stack instead of in the heap, that further limited it. If I
was writing stuff from scratch that was also going to run on it, I
would work on putting the data on the heap.
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-15 23:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-13 19:31 exception access violation Jade
2006-11-13 21:35 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-11-14 9:09 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-11-14 19:34 ` Jade
2006-11-15 9:58 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-11-15 9:52 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-11-15 13:32 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-11-15 23:43 ` Kevin K [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-18 16:05 Exception_Access_Violation mhamel_98
2009-05-18 16:14 ` Exception_Access_Violation John B. Matthews
2009-05-19 7:23 ` Exception_Access_Violation Alex R. Mosteo
2009-05-20 15:30 ` Exception_Access_Violation mhamel_98
2009-05-22 14:34 ` Exception_Access_Violation Björn Persson
2009-05-22 15:17 ` Exception_Access_Violation Niklas Holsti
2009-05-22 16:38 ` Exception_Access_Violation Adam Beneschan
2001-12-07 12:41 exception access violation Cousins, Jeff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox